Thatkindofmom

gentle-parenting support and ideas for all kinds of moms…….

To Spank or Not to Spank? December 8, 2007

Filed under: Uncategorized — thatkindofmom @ 10:28 pm

An incident at the grocery store recently got me wondering about spanking. Even though I was spanked as a child I don’t remember any controversy over spanking.  I do remember vowing that I’d never spank my own children, but I also vowed I’d let them eat whatever sugar cereal they wanted.

Fast-forward to now, a mother at the grocery store swatted her toddler yesterday in the cereal isle because the kid was screaming (oddly enough) about Cocoa-Puffs. The spanking was swift and didn’t seem too terribly painful, but the child only continued to scream louder. I decided to learn more about spanking.

One interesting thing when doing a cursory Google search on spanking is the amount of porn and sexual websites that are unveiled by any search with the word “spanking” in it. Interestingly enough, there is also a plethora of research that indicates that spanking children has extremely negative sexual connotations that can be very damaging to children. One such article titled “Spanking and the Corporal Punishment of Children: The Sexual Story”, published in the International Journal of Children’s Rights, portrays spanking as a much more damaging and complex social practice than it is commonly thought to be.

But for some parents, especially those who believe that in extreme situations spanking is the only way to get their child’s attention, removing spanking is like taking away all their power as parents. For some parents spanking is the last resort for use in situations when the child is in danger. 

The American Academy of Pediatircs argues, however, that spanking is not as useful as some parents think it is. The AAP is strongly opposed to the use of spanking in children and does not recommend it under any circumstance. Instead, they encourage redirection of children under two, and ”time-outs” for use in children three and older. The ”time-out” should be administered in one minute increments per year of the child’s age. So, a three-year-old has to sit for three minutes and so on. 

Currently many other countries consider spanking to be corporal punishment and have outlawed the practice. Most European countries, Israel and Japan have laws that prohibit the physical punishment of children, including through spanking. Here is an interesting take on spanking as corporal punishment.

Claire Cohen, mother of two-year old Amelia, says she hadn’t felt strongly about spanking until her daughter entered the nerve-racking toddler phase of life. “I never was anti-spanking or anything, I guess it didn’t occur to me until I was trying to teach my daughter that it’s not okay to hit, or bite, or pinch,” says Cohen. ”It just didn’t make sense to me that I could be always telling her it’s not okay to hit and then go and smack her.”

Many parents and childhood educators agree with Cohen and insist that spanking is abuse and sends the wrong message to children. Some argue that aside from the sexual boundaries and trust issues that are violated when a child is spanked, the foundation of respect that adults are supposed to foster in children is seriously undermined in the process.

“It’s hypocrisy, pure and simple,” says Cohen who explains that she doesn’t ever want her daughter to think it’s okay for someone bigger than her to hit her or touch her body, especially her bottom, in a violent way. 

 

Toxic Toys December 2, 2007

Filed under: Uncategorized — thatkindofmom @ 12:32 am

As if dangerous lead-based paint on millions of children’s toys wasn’t enough, the most recently recalled toy has been found to be coated with a substance which, when ingested, turns into Gamma-Hydroxy Butyrate, otherwise known as the “date rape” drug.  

In light of the seemingly never-ending toxic toy debacle, many parents are looking for alternative toys to buy this holiday season. The big question is; what is safe? Robert Persinger, of Seattle’s Top Ten Toys in Greenwood explains that although they don’t carry any of the recalled products at the moment, it’s hard because it’s difficult to know what’s coming next.  ”It isn’t really China that’s the problem,” says Persinger, “It’s just a hand-full of the toy manufacturers, so I want to think it will get under control, but we can’t predict the future.”  

Persinger also said that many parents, it seems, have given up on trying to keep up with the extensive recall lists, and instead are just choosing to avoid any toys made in China. According to Persinger, his store has actually been largely unaffected by the recalls because they don’t rely heavily on toys made in China. “As a locally-owned and operated business we have always tried to stock alternatives to what you will find next-door at Fred Meyer,” said Persinger. 

Persinger recommends toys from Thailand, the U.S. and Europe as some of the most popular alternatives to Chinese-made toys. Many American and European toys are made of wood and are usually higher-quality as well, which means they should last longer than the cheap ones. One thing to look for, especially when shopping for baby toys, is the symbol CE, which indicates that the toy is Phylate-Free. Phylates are another dangerous chemical found mainly in plastic baby toys.

If alternative toy choices are hard to come by in stores, there are a variety of great online toy stores in the U.S. that carry a variety of safe, handmade toys. Here’s a store in Vermont that stocks safe, high-quality toys for purchase online.

The European and American-made toys on store shelves tend to be more pricey that their Chinese-made counterparts, but it's worth a couple of extra bucks for the peace of mind that comes with knowing our kids aren't being poisoned while they play.